The Paper Trail That's Holding Your Institution Back
Dear Educator,
Let me ask you something: How long did your last vendor payment take from request to actual payment?
If you're like most institution leaders I speak with, the answer is somewhere between "too long" and "I'm honestly not sure—it's still pending."
Here's the uncomfortable truth: while your institution is preparing students for a digital future, you're likely running your operations on a system that would feel familiar to administrators from 1985.
The Paper Prison
Walk into most school administrative offices today, and you'll see it immediately: filing cabinets overflowing with purchase orders, desks buried under stacks of approval forms, sticky notes reminding someone to follow up on a request from last week, WhatsApp groups buzzing with "Can you check the status of..." messages.
This isn't a sign of poor management. It's the inevitable result of running a complex institution on paper-based systems in 2025.
What "Paper-Based" Really Means
When I say "paper-based systems," I'm not just talking about physical documents. I'm talking about any process that relies on:
Manual handoffs - Information physically or manually transferred from person to person
Disconnected tools - Email for requests, Excel for tracking, WhatsApp for follow-ups
No central visibility - You can't see status without asking multiple people
Sequential bottlenecks - Work stops when one person is unavailable
Retroactive documentation - Recreating what happened after the fact
Sound familiar? That's a paper-based system, even if you've "gone digital" with PDFs and email.
The Real Cost of Slow
Last week, I spoke with a college principal who told me this story:
"Our sports department needed equipment for an inter-college tournament. The request was submitted 15 days before the event. Between waiting for the HOD's approval, my availability to sign, accounts verifying budget, processing the payment, and bank clearance—it took 10 days. By the time we actually paid the vendor, we had just 5 days until the tournament. The vendor couldn't deliver in time. We had to make emergency local purchases at 40% higher cost."
The cost wasn't just the 40% markup. It was damaged vendor relationships, stressed staff firefighting for hours, compromised student experience, and a demotivated department that now hesitates to request anything.
One 10-day delay created ripples across the entire institution.
The true cost isn't just delays—it's the productivity drain across your entire team.
Your Accounts Manager spends daily:
45 minutes tracking down supporting documents
30 minutes calling for clarifications
1 hour manually entering data from paper forms
45 minutes answering "what's the status?" queries
That's 3 hours daily on coordination instead of strategic work—vendor negotiations, budget analysis, or financial planning.
Multiply that across your team. You're losing dozens of productive hours every single day to systemic inefficiency.
Why "Just Try Harder" Doesn't Work
I've heard this before: "We just need to be more disciplined about following the process."
But here's the problem—your people are trying hard. They're putting in extra hours. They're creating workarounds. They're doing their best.
The issue isn't effort. It's the system itself.
When your official process takes 2-3 weeks for something that should take 2-3 days, people are forced to choose between:
Following the process and letting urgent needs go unmet
Creating workarounds that bypass controls
Neither option is good. The first creates operational failures. The second creates compliance risks and loss of institutional control.
You can't discipline your way out of a structural problem.
Where Time Actually Goes
A typical procurement process in most institutions:
Days 1-2: Request sits in someone's inbox
Day 3: First reviewer has questions, sends it back
Days 4-5: Department head provides clarification
Days 6-7: Moves through approval chain
Day 8: Reaches accounts, budget verification needed
Days 9-10: Payment preparation and final signatures
7-10 days for a routine purchase. But here's what's striking: the actual work time—reviewing, approving, processing—is maybe 2-3 hours total. The rest? Waiting. Waiting for availability, information, handoffs, and signatures.
The Compounding Effect
Slow systems don't just delay individual transactions—they create ripples across your institution:
Strategic Impact: Can't respond quickly to opportunities; decisions based on old data; miss early payment discounts worth lakhs
Cultural Impact: Team demotivation; initiative punished by bureaucracy; shadow systems emerge as workarounds multiply
Financial Impact: Higher vendor prices; missed bulk purchase opportunities; overtime costs; audit complications
Relationship Impact: Vendor trust erodes; department heads feel unsupported; your leadership time consumed by firefighting
The Questions You Should Ask
Can you track every pending approval right now without asking anyone?
Does your fastest approval path take more than 48 hours for routine requests?
What percentage of your senior staff's time goes to coordination vs. strategy?
How many requests bypass your official process?
Can you make a payment without physically signing something?
If any answer concerns you, your system is holding you back.
What's Actually Possible
Modern educational institutions run on systems with:
Real-time visibility - Every stakeholder sees exactly where things stand
Parallel processing - Approvals happen simultaneously, not sequentially
Mobile accessibility - Approve from anywhere, anytime
Automatic routing - Requests reach the right people based on rules
Digital audit trails - Complete documentation without paper storage
Data-driven decisions - Real-time dashboards instead of week-old Excel sheets
The difference isn't magic. It's simply having systems designed for 2025 instead of 1985.
A Simple Test
Keep a log this week of every time:
Someone asks "What's the status of...?"
You physically sign something
A decision is delayed because someone is unavailable
You manually compile data that already exists somewhere
Add up the time. Multiply by 50 weeks. That's how many hours annually your institution loses to systemic friction.
The Path Forward
The good news? This is solvable.
Unlike many institutional challenges, operational inefficiency is entirely within your control. You don't need external permission or massive IT projects. You just need better systems.
The question isn't whether digital systems are better than paper-based ones—that's settled. The question is: when will your institution make the transition?
Every day you delay is another day of lost productivity, frustrated staff, missed opportunities, and your time consumed by operational friction.
In our next newsletter, I'll share the exact framework leading institutions use to transition from paper-based chaos to digital clarity—without disrupting ongoing operations.
Until then, hit reply and tell me: What's the most frustrating "slow" process in your institution right now?
To your institution's efficiency,
Sankara Subramanian
Head of Technology, Unity Edu
P.S. - If this resonates, you're experiencing what 83% of educational institutions report as their #1 operational challenge. The encouraging news? It's the most solvable problem you face.
